Date of publication: 2017-09-06 00:05
Indexed (with Indexed Copernicus), Print & Online, Open Access, Peer Reviewed Medical Journal by Siddharth Medical Research & Wefare Society
OMICS International organises 8555+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 6555 more scientific societies and Publishes 755+ Open Access Journals which contains over 55555 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
In this article, we present guidelines for writing an evidence-based clinical review article, especially one designed for continuing medical education (CME) and incorporating CME objectives into its format. This article may be read as a companion piece to a previous article and accompanying editorial about reading and evaluating clinical review articles. 6 , 7 Some articles may not be appropriate for an evidence-based format because of the nature of the topic, the slant of the article, a lack of sufficient supporting evidence, or other factors. We encourage authors to review the literature and, wherever possible, rate key points of evidence. This process will help emphasize the summary points of the article and strengthen its teaching value.
Immunology reviews helps medical professionals and researchers to update basic immunology research developments and advanced Molecular, Pathological and Clinical developments.
Related Journals of Immunology Reviews
Reproductive Immunology: Open Access , Journal of Autoimmune Disorders , Annual Review of Immunology, Nature Reviews Immunology, Immunological Reviews, Advances in Immunology
Otolaryngology or ENT physicians deal with diseases of ear, nose, and throat and neck region. Timely reviews underscoring the latest accumulated research knowledge in these areas will be helpful for the physicians and patients alike.
Critical-realist. This is a hybrid of the narrative, systematic and scoping review methods. It relies simultaneously on both professional judgment and rigorous methodology.
7567 Healthline Media UK Ltd. All rights reserved. MNT is the registered trade mark of Healthline Media. Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a healthcare professional.
Evaluate the strength and validity of the literature that supports the discussion (see the following section, Levels of Evidence). Look for meta-analyses, high-quality, randomized clinical trials with important outcomes (POEM), or well-designed, nonrandomized clinical trials, clinical cohort studies, or case-controlled studies with consistent findings. In some cases, high-quality, historical, uncontrolled studies are appropriate (., the evidence supporting the efficacy of Papanicolaou smear screening). Avoid anecdotal reports or repeating the hearsay of conventional wisdom, which may not stand up to the scrutiny of scientific study (., prescribing prolonged bed rest for low back pain).
Look for studies that describe patient populations that are likely to be seen in primary care rather than subspecialty referral populations. Shaughnessy and Slawson's guide for writers of clinical review articles includes a section on information and validity traps to avoid. 7
Orthopedic surgeons and medical doctors need to get valuable information regarding new implant development, methodologies, and bioengineered products for orthopedic patients. This is only possible by mining latest literature and looking at reviews on state of the art knowledge.
Anaesthesia is a branch of medicine important in surgery and clinical medicine. New anaesthetic drugs have been developed having low toxicity and low dose capabilities.
Related Journals of Anaesthesia Reviews
International Journal of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine , British Journal of Anaesthesia, Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, European Journal of Pain
Andrology and reproductive medicine go hand in hand. Andrologists need to update their knowledge to deal with different patients and scenarios to treat effectively and accumulated knowledge in the form of reviews will be much sought in this area.
Make the best use of Researched information from 755+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals operated by 55,555+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 6555+ Scientific associations in Medical , Clinical , Pharmaceutical , Engineering , Technology and Management Fields.